Understanding Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) for Cannabis Businesses

19 November 2025

See How We're Different

GET A QUOTE

or call us: (215) 653-8411

What Is the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA)?

TRIA was enacted in 2002 after the September 11 attacks to stabilize the insurance market by ensuring that terrorism-related losses would be covered. It acts as a federal backstop, sharing the financial burden of terrorism claims between the government and insurers. The program has been extended multiple times, with the most recent reauthorization increasing the mandatory recoupment amount from $27.5 billion to $37.5 billion, reflecting the growing scale of potential claims according to the National Association of Realtors.


Simply put, TRIA requires insurers to offer terrorism coverage for eligible lines of insurance, but only after a certain threshold of losses is met. This means that businesses can purchase terrorism risk insurance with some assurance that the government will help cover catastrophic losses. However, the program primarily targets traditional industries and large-scale commercial risks, which can complicate matters for emerging sectors like cannabis. As the landscape of threats evolves, so too does the need for comprehensive coverage that addresses the unique risks faced by various industries, including those that are still navigating regulatory uncertainties.


How TRIA Coverage Works


Under TRIA, insurers must offer terrorism coverage as part of their commercial property and casualty policies. If a certified act of terrorism occurs, insurers pay claims up to a deductible, after which the federal government reimburses a significant portion of the losses. For 2017, the total premium paid for terrorism coverage was about $3.65 billion, representing 1.75% of the $209.15 billion in total premiums for TRIA-eligible insurance lines according to a 2018 Treasury report.


This federal support helps keep terrorism insurance affordable and available. But cannabis businesses face unique hurdles when it comes to qualifying for these policies, given the patchwork of state laws and federal restrictions that still classify cannabis as a controlled substance. The complexities of navigating these regulations can deter insurers from providing coverage, leading to a significant gap in protection for businesses operating in this burgeoning industry. As the cannabis market continues to expand, the demand for tailored risk management solutions that align with TRIA's framework may prompt discussions among policymakers about how to adapt the program to include these emerging sectors.


Moreover, the implications of TRIA extend beyond just the insurance market; they also play a crucial role in the broader economic landscape. By providing a safety net for businesses, TRIA fosters an environment where companies can invest and grow without the paralyzing fear of catastrophic financial loss due to terrorism. This stability is particularly important in sectors that are vital to national security and public safety, as it encourages innovation and resilience in the face of potential threats. As we look to the future, the ongoing evolution of TRIA will likely reflect the changing dynamics of risk and the need for comprehensive coverage that addresses both traditional and emerging threats.

Why Cannabis Businesses Face Insurance Challenges

The cannabis industry has rapidly evolved from a fringe market to a mainstream sector with expanding legal acceptance. Despite this progress, insurance remains a complicated issue. About 75% of cannabis industry respondents report feeling underinsured, caught between high premiums and insufficient coverage according to TruePath Insurance.


Traditional insurers often hesitate to offer comprehensive policies to cannabis businesses because of federal legal risks and regulatory uncertainties. This hesitancy extends to terrorism risk insurance, which is typically bundled with other commercial coverages. Cannabis businesses may find it difficult to secure terrorism coverage or face prohibitive costs when they do.


Intersection of Cannabis and Property/Casualty Insurance


The National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC) has highlighted the complex relationship between cannabis operations and property/casualty insurance. Their analysis points out that cannabis businesses require tailored insurance solutions that address their unique risks, including property damage, liability, and crime, but also terrorism risk as detailed in their industry report.


Because cannabis businesses often operate in cash-heavy environments with high-value inventory and property, they can be attractive targets for criminal activity, including terrorism-related threats. This makes terrorism risk insurance not just a regulatory formality but a practical necessity for many operators. Moreover, the evolving landscape of cannabis legalization has led to a patchwork of state laws, further complicating the insurance landscape. Insurers must navigate varying regulations, which can lead to inconsistent coverage options across different jurisdictions.


Additionally, the stigma surrounding cannabis use still lingers in some circles, which can affect how insurers perceive risk. Many insurance providers may lack the experience or data needed to accurately assess the risks associated with cannabis businesses, leading to conservative underwriting practices. This can result in higher premiums or limited coverage options that do not adequately protect operators from potential losses. As the industry matures, however, there is hope that increased data sharing and collaboration between cannabis businesses and insurers will lead to more comprehensive and affordable insurance solutions tailored to this unique market.

How TRIA Impacts Cannabis Business Insurance

Understanding TRIA’s role in cannabis insurance requires recognizing the program’s federal nature versus the state-specific legal landscape of cannabis. While TRIA provides a federal backstop for terrorism losses, cannabis businesses must first secure eligible commercial insurance policies that include terrorism coverage. This is often the biggest hurdle.


Because cannabis remains federally illegal, many insurers exclude cannabis-related risks from their standard policies. Without an eligible underlying policy, TRIA coverage cannot be triggered. This leaves cannabis businesses vulnerable to terrorism-related losses without the safety net TRIA offers to other industries.


Potential Benefits of TRIA for Cannabis Businesses


For cannabis businesses that do manage to secure terrorism risk insurance, TRIA offers significant financial protection. In the event of a certified terrorist act causing damage or loss, the federal government’s involvement helps insurers manage their exposure, which in turn can help keep premiums more stable.


This protection is crucial for cannabis operators who face high risks due to the nature of their products and operations. It also signals a maturing insurance market that is beginning to accommodate the cannabis sector’s needs, even if progress is slow.


Moreover, the inclusion of TRIA in cannabis insurance discussions highlights the evolving perception of the cannabis industry within the broader economic landscape. As more states legalize cannabis for medical and recreational use, the potential for growth in this sector becomes increasingly evident. Insurers are beginning to recognize that cannabis businesses are not just niche markets but integral parts of the economy that require comprehensive risk management solutions. This shift could lead to more innovative insurance products tailored specifically for the unique challenges faced by cannabis operators.


Furthermore, as the cannabis industry continues to grow, the demand for robust security measures and insurance products will likely increase. This could encourage more insurers to enter the market, potentially leading to more competitive pricing and better coverage options. The interplay between TRIA and cannabis insurance may also prompt legislative discussions about the need for clearer federal guidelines on cannabis, which could further enhance the industry’s stability and attractiveness to investors. As these dynamics unfold, cannabis businesses may find themselves in a better position to secure the necessary protections to thrive in an increasingly complex landscape.

What Cannabis Businesses Should Consider Regarding TRIA

Insurance buyers in the cannabis industry should approach terrorism risk insurance with a clear understanding of their coverage options and limitations. Here are key considerations:



Given the rapid growth and evolving legal landscape of cannabis, staying informed about insurance developments is essential. The industry's expansion from criminality to commercial enterprise has been remarkable, but insurance must catch up to provide adequate protection as Milliman notes.


Furthermore, cannabis businesses should also be aware of the specific risks associated with their operations. For instance, cultivation facilities may be particularly vulnerable to acts of vandalism or targeted attacks due to their high-value inventory. This necessitates a nuanced understanding of not just terrorism risk, but also the broader spectrum of security threats that could impact their operations. Engaging in comprehensive risk assessments can help identify these vulnerabilities and inform insurance decisions.


Additionally, as the cannabis market continues to mature, regulatory changes may influence the availability and terms of terrorism risk insurance. Businesses should keep abreast of legislative developments that could affect their insurance landscape, such as changes in federal or state laws regarding cannabis. This proactive approach not only aids in securing the right coverage but also positions businesses to adapt swiftly to an ever-evolving environment, ensuring they remain resilient against unforeseen risks.

Comparing Terrorism Risk Insurance for Cannabis vs. Traditional Businesses

Aspect Cannabis Businesses Traditional Businesses
Federal Legality Federally illegal; complicates insurance eligibility Fully legal; broad insurance availability
Insurance Availability Limited, high cost, coverage gaps common Widely available with standard policies
TRIA Eligibility Dependent on securing eligible policies Generally automatic with commercial policies
Risk Exposure High due to cash operations and inventory Varies by industry but often lower risk profile
Premium Costs Often higher due to risk and legal status Typically lower, reflecting broader market

Preparing for the Future of Cannabis Insurance and TRIA

Frequently Asked Questions

What to Remember

Article By: Deb Sculli

Cannabis Insurance Specialist

Search
Recent Posts
Cost-Saving Risk Management Tactics That Improve Cannabis Insurance Quotes
19 November 2025
Learn how cannabis businesses can lower insurance costs with risk management, security, employee training, and smart cultivation practices.
When to Consider Umbrella Insurance for Cannabis Business Protection
19 November 2025
Learn when cannabis businesses need umbrella insurance to protect against high liability, rising premiums, and regulatory risks.
Tax Implications of Cannabis Insurance Deductions for Business Owners
19 November 2025
Explore how cannabis insurance premiums impact taxes, deductions, and profitability, and how rescheduling could ease financial burdens for business owners.
Show More